Wolf pa, dagostino rb, belanger aj, kannel wb probability of stroke. C h o l e s t e rol education pro g r a m n c e p 1 4 y v. In the mexican population we are unaware if the framingham model is a better system than the score system for stratifying cardiovascular risk. Framingham ldl femalemale 10 year coronary risk prediction 1998 paper medcalc 3000. It also aims to help physicians rapidly estimate the cardiovascular risk of their patients and discuss and analyze. Risk prediction estimates for the risk of various cardiovascular disease outcomes in different time horizons. Pahowho application to estimate the cardiovascular risk. Framingham score procam varones reynolds mujeres reynolds varones n 5. See the official framingham website for additional. Framingham risk score for hard coronary heart disease mdcalc. General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care. If playback doesnt begin shortly, try restarting your device.
The present study was conducted to compare risk stratification with the framingham tables using the same procedure but using. Menotti a, puddu pe, lanti m european heart journal 2000 21, 365370. Joint british recommendations on prevention of coronary heart disease in clinical practice. Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories. Framingham a las recomendaciones del n a t i o n a l. Concordancia entre escalas framingham atp iii, score y. Mdcalc uses the hard coronary framingham outcomes model, which is intended for use in nondiabetic patients age 3079 years with no prior history of coronary heart disease or intermittent claudication, as it is the most widely applicable to patients without previous cardiac events.
1267 701 1099 953 131 497 438 989 897 158 717 1039 5 183 901 1411 461 400 1222 1245 652 426 335 1339 90 729 1134 376 269 330 1215 1118 449 1060 1397 801 1019 1061 1200 685